Friday, May 18, 2007

What's the Difference Between a Woman and a Prostitute Besides the Honesty?

*Title reference

In using the written word as my primary instrument for expression, and using it again and again exhaustively, I fear that I’ve realized something that I have longed denied, the written word by itself is limited in scope. How then can we express ourselves?

What have I used the written word for? Early on, I realized that through exaggeration and extremism and even simply through blunt frankness, humor can be conjured effortlessly. In retrospect, most of my work, in the latter part of my life, has been excess. This was initially, excess with a point. Excess, in this case meant anything and everything. Excessive pseudo- “racism,” “confidence,” “masculinity,” “feminity,” “emotionality,” “sexism,” “narcissisms,” and “misogyny” were all themes that supposedly unified under a singular directive and message: “Get over yourselves people!”

At times, this was used to great effect and I cannot help but be a little guilty because much of this can be said and described as manipulative (but we all are!). Under various guises, my writing possessed an alternate persona—one that reflected little upon myself. This has grown stale and the formula needs something new, either that, or I have to reinvent the persona from ground up. But how so, when my persona lacked style and personality?

The problem ironically, stems precisely from the fact that I never got into myself. How could I get over myself when I was never really into myself in the first place?! There lies the paradoxical epiphany and the statement is made with sincerity. More significantly I realize, I am perhaps the most “impersonal” person, to ever write. Various divagations in my writing distract from my more important thoughts—there is always an ulterior motive. Furthermore, this is aggravated by the use of formality—the language is at times verbose—perhaps alienating some potential readers. More embarrassingly, is that some teenage blogs, xangas, and MySpace are more “personal” in content than I ever will be.

What then is my definition of “personal” language? Personal language, I suppose is anything expressed that can leave the originator of the content vulnerable. Yeah, sure telling you that my favorite color is blue, my favorite drink is soy milk, and my favorite book is The Catcher in the Rye is personal but largely in an inconsequential sort of way— it leaves no vulnerability. Furthermore going around asking questions like “What’s the difference between a woman and a prostitute besides the honesty?” does not really help matters.

So, how about some introspective narcissism? Most of the time, I realize that my writing protects me via a perpetual devolution into pretentious abstract. Where are the concrete revelations?

Let us start. My greatest weakness is one of indecisiveness, there are many things that I am sure of but most of the time I am uncertain. In the past, I have spent and invested great lengths of time and energy to mask this debilitating weakness by doing well in school and staying competitive, courteous, and most of all, reserved. The things that I know I like include music, writing, and thinking. As for people, I’m not sure. I’m quite apathetic when it comes to people. I think this apathy is worse than hatred since hatred shows concern while the former does not. I cherish the few friends I do have and yet it is more important for me to appear to have friends than to actually have them. There must be some shitty Freudian explanation for my downfalls…

I fail. I fail to tell you how I really feel. And I apologize. A friend of mine tells me that I’m “weird.” Another one points out that I’m an “enigma.” In either case, there is some truth to the generalization. However, to be precise, it is my disparate and oftentimes deliberate displacement of the self from my writing persona that creates an ambiguity of identification.

Even now, I'd like to say, ring in the Golden age of "emo-ism".... I hope I approach it with creativity!

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Chapter I: Two Runaways Buried in the Snow

To those who died...


Untitled
In youth's tragic fortune passed
That stolen ghost of beautiful lass
Departs forthwith unto a spanless, icy sea
Whilst he battles angels for vestiges of she.

Such prophets of bulbous eye, of searching glass magnifiers
Sight of a hearts' conflagration, heavy in black fires
What medicine prescribed and disease incurred
For only slight strength remains in soul's organ punctured

The boy once believed in consequence and in Jove
Besieged by a cloud of sulfur of mind, thence ushered salty eyes
Her existence denounced; What of Love? he now loathes
And questions spiritless in cruel atheist tongue: why?

Of the petite inequities of life
Why...

Saturday, May 5, 2007

What of Artistic Integrity? Where have the virtues of Journalism gone?

Of all the world matters that could have and should have made it to the front page, CNN showcased what can be termed, upon little inspection, journalistic defecation. I have no screenshot to tell but why would Paris Hilton getting 45 days in prison be news of such pertinence and gravity that it deserves front page reverence along with a photo of her celebrity ineptitude is beyond me.

My 'blog' has very little traffic. I'm tired, even exasperated. Academics has been a rude awakening call and most of the time writing has become a sort of solace but that is not to say in desperation, I don't want recognition. Acknowledgment is always encouraging. Perhaps my prose is limp and uninspiring. Whatever the case maybe, I've decided that journalistic integrity is overrated and artistic integrity rendered impractical.

I think I shall post pornography. Right now, I'm just making sure it does not violate Google's Terms of Use Agreement.

Before anyone asks, it's not going to be naked pictures of myself. I prize my dignity enough not to resort to the basest of things, exploitative shock journalism.

I think I shall delete this post. Maybe. Maybe pornography is the way to get traffic these days.


Small Digression
If the sciences which include amongst others physics, chemistry, and biology are the ultimate search for truth then the arts which include amongst others language, painting, music, and sculpture, are the ultimate search for beauty, then what of the bridges in between?
In my years of academia, I've finally realized what these are. Communications, Sociology and Psychology. These are the so-called Social Scientific disciplines. I'm not sure of the Politically Scientific but the Social Scientific disciplines all claim to be science. I respect the arts in that it claims to be art as it should. I revere the sciences, its process and philosophy, however I do not necessarily enjoy its practice. But the social sciences are such pure bullshit in that instead of accepting the fact that they are somewhere in-between, they insist they are science when they are not. In fact, they spend an entire chapter explaining and elaborating on why social science is indeed science. I'm all for overpaid assholes teaching classes (people need jobs and as a pragmatist, I understand people need to make a living) but at least, have the integrity to admit to yourselves, you little scum, that this is not science. It's a "study" albeit a very interesting study. Assholes.